Tarih 05 Haziran,2017
Paylaşan: Mustafa GUNES
In order to take advantage of the exception within Article 13/(i) of Value Added Tax Law (referred to herein as VATL), one shall neither accomplish and deliver properties as if operationalized nor execute a conveyance of title on the very first day.
A VAT exception regarding residential estate and properties which are handed from abroad is brought by the effectuated law no. 6824 that is issued on 8 March 2017 dated Official Gazette. Technically, (i) sub clause is added to the first paragraph of Article 13 of Value Added Tax Law (“VATL”) by means of the Law no 6824, thus another exception referred in CVAT is inserted to the Code. Related Article 7 of law no. 6824 as follows:
Article 7 –
Following sub clause is inserted within the first paragraph of Article 13 of 25/10/1984 dated and 3065 numbered Value Added Tax Law.
“i) only if providing the application at the first delivery of property or workplace constructions and bringing the price as foreign currency to Turkey; Turkish citizens who are living abroad more than six months by obtaining work and residence permit; foreign national real persons who are not residing in Turkey ;and institutions which are not gaining profits from Turkey via a company or a permanent representative and do not have a registered or working office in Turkey; with the exception of designated at second paragraph of first sub clause in the 3rd article of Income Tax Law ( Such that, both tax-payer and buyer shall be jointly and severely liable for taxes that are uncollectible on time, loss of tax penalty and interest of default in case of determining an application of the exception although specified conditions within the sub clause is not provided. In the case of disposing delivered property or workplace within the exception, before title deed transaction disposer must pay taxes that are uncollectible on time, with deferment interest which is calculated with regard to 48th Article of Law no.6183.),”
A notice has issued in 05.05.2017 dated Official Gazette to illuminating the application of VAT exception, recognizable with the aforementioned provision of Law. Described application within the notice is appropriate in many ways while there are some crucial parts that need to be criticized:
These provisions are written in such way that; to apply the exception which is determined in Law no.6824, firstly a property or a workplace needs to be finished as ready for a buyer’s use and has to be made its delivery in land registry directorate. In fact, the regulation in the Law is not excluded those two matters while it is not asserting them as mandatory factors.
In the case of applying the notice as is, there would be lots of problems regarding sales with respect to especially prepaid sales that is to say real estates which are not ready to be delivered; a number of transactions about exception will be decreased and in conclusion expected benefit from the Law, may not be reached. Again, landowners or investors prefer not to consult transferring of the right of access because of possible project alterations in combined projects especially. Yet, transferring title may result with a problem of receiving approval of many owners in the process of zoning and license, and finalization of the project may be at risk. Thus, if the conveyance of title will be a mandatory application as the Notice prescribed, an opportunity of benefiting from VAT exception by many large projects, would disappear. In order to prevent these problems, the Notice needs to be aligned with the Law and from now on, the application should be temper to the Law rather than the Notice.
While approaching the subject as a legal regulation, it would be significant to determine what “the procreator subject matter of tax is” since the subject matter is a tax. Yet, the tax shall be born primarily to mention a tax exemption. The procreator subject matter of VAT is defined in VAT Law Article 10, follows as:
Occurrence of the procreator subject matter:
Article 10 –
Procreator Subject Matter:
a) In the event of delivery of goods and service accomplishment, delivering the goods or accomplishing the service,
b) Before delivering the good or executing the service, in case of procuring invoice and so forth documents, regulating invoice or likewise documents limited to the amount in these documents, (…)
It is understood from literal of the Article that even there will be no invoice making out, delivering the good will procreate the VAT. Though paragraph (b) indicates that preparing invoice or so forth documents before delivering the good, the VAT will arise with a limitation to a number of such documents. The reason of such regulation is; about effectuating and collecting the tax obviously.
At this point, it is important to determine the time when the invoice will be arranged. Regarding this issue, Article 231/5 of VAT includes “the invoice shall be arranged within minimum seven days from delivery of the good or executing the service”. The same paragraph aims to arrange the invoice punctually by stating that the invoices which are not arranged in designated time, shall be regarded as unadjusted invoices. Another saying, in our opinion, there is no rule of law about making out an invoice in advance. Designated time being by Law; is about the last date for making out an invoice.
On the other hand, the main goal of the Law no. 6824 that brought VAT exemption regarding property and workplaces which have a price as foreign currency, is to inflow of foreign currency to the country. That is to say, legislator prefers not to take a tax which should be taken under normal circumstances, to provide inflow of foreign currency and to keep this money within the borders of the country for minimum one year; preferring inflow of foreign currency rather than tax collection.
When we evaluate both of rule of law and their goals;
Under these circumstances, there is no legal basis to make a regulation in (12.1.1.) the Article of Notice as “a structure that is constructed as a property or a workplace, must have a building license and must be assigned in fact as ready for buyers to use”. In our opinion, it is possible to bind an invoice to a sale of constructed detached-section even though the construction is not finished yet, only if constituting a construction servitude, and VAT exemption shall be made as far as the amount which appears on the invoice. Constituting a construction servitude condition is arises intrinsically. Hence this condition shall be met since it is not possible to mention a limited property right which is officially registered and also not possible to indicate which detached-section is sold, without establishing construction servitude. Therefore, regulation of the Notice is appropriate.
Regulation within the Notice about detached-sections to be sold, as “they must be assigned as ready to use”, is based on misevaluation of the statement in VAT Article 10(i) as “implementing at first delivery”. Again, the legislator makes a choice and indicates that its aim is not solely about providing foreign currency, but also prefers giving precedence to building society (namely manufacturers) to making sales, in order to support those who create added-value and employment by building, rather than those who make property merchandising. Consequently, “first delivery” expression in here, is to exclude pre-owned sales. Due to the same reason, by preferring “first delivery” rather than “first transfer”, the aim of delivering the good and not selling it for one year by foreign currency bringers who benefit from VAT exemption, is provided. If we will handle legislator’s main goal as providing permanent foreign currency input and making manufacturer sector to benefit from it principally, then understanding the literal of the law will be correct, so preventing unwanted consequences will be possible.
When we evaluate the regulation at (12.2) Art. of the Notice, we need to get back to 10/(i) Art. of VAT which is inserted with the Law no.6824. Last sentence within bracketed of relevant paragraph includes a provision, such that “In case of disposing a property or a workplace within the scope of exemption, in one year, it is a must for taxes that are uncollectible on time, (…) shall be paid with deferment interest, by disposer before title deed transaction”. There is an ambiguity in the second part of this sentence. Afterward of the sentence, rather than “before title deed transaction” there should be “before title deed transaction or disposing between delivery time to the end of one year ”. Yet, this sentence doesn’t sound consistent as is. When we read the sentence correctly, it is not difficult to understand that the legislator aims to keep the input foreign currency at least one year so that it couldn’t have the characteristics of hot money. Making such a regulation by the legislator doesn’t need to be perceived “title deed transaction” in (12.3) Art. of the Notice as a precondition. Parties may reach a consensus about price and payment conditions by making an agreement inter se and make a payment in return for the invoice. Again, parties may determine the time of title deed transfer by becoming a part of herein agreement. The critical point in here is; buyer shall not transfer the premise from delivery or from transfer until one year, and by any chance, it is transferred then it should be annotated that the excluded tax needs to be paid with deferment interest rate. Thus and so, protected main goal of the Law will be provided. Therewith it doesn’t need to be interpreted the last sentence of the 10(i) Art. of VAT Law provision as: there should be a title deed transfer transaction to benefit from the exemption.
In terms of understanding the topic clearly; it is good to examine an example in the Notice. Let’s suppose that parties agreed to payment conditions regarding a property which have a price that comes from abroad as foreign currency by an alien, that this payment will be one-half cash and the other-half will be paid by 6 installments. When we examine the case with intendment and literal of law, as distinct from the Notice, application in this case study shall be:
As it is seen from the example, the application could take place without depending on completion of the building or transfer of title deeds from day one, and it is very easy for tax administration to detect if any misappropriation arises. Besides the only thing that tax administration will do, comprise of obtaining the statement that is referred at (3)rd step and then questioning (4)th step from registries of deeds and controlling the condition which takes place at (5)th step. A contrary idea; namely insisting on ready to use delivery and insisting on transfer conditions, could decrease transaction number, end up with having less foreign currency input, thus will not serve the main aim that the law protects. Abusing this way is not end up with a loss of public finance because the essential tax can be collected with its deferment interest.
To sum up our relevant legal opinion briefly; to benefit from the exemption which is inserted in Art. 13(i) of VAT, it is not mandatory neither to complete real estates as ready to use nor transfer title deeds from day one.
Etiketler: residential estate, workplace, working places, article, property, gazette, CVAT, delivery of property in turkish law, law system in turkey, deferment interest, tax law in turkey, rules in tax law, national, real person, turkish citizens who are living abroad, residence permit in turkey